Showing posts with label Yahoo Finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yahoo Finance. Show all posts

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Don't Assume Titan Machinery Will Be Profitable because Management Says So

On Yahoo Finance someone asked "What PE Should Titan Machinery Trade At?"

My Answer:

Your question assumes Titan Machinery will even have any earnings in FY 2015.
I question if Titan will even be profitable this year.
In the company's most recent reported Q1 they loss ($0.20) per share. The quarter prior to that ,Q4, they loss money as well.

We can't expect the management's guidance to mean anything.
Management made the following Guidance for FY2014:
  • On April 10,2013 gave guidance for FY2014 of $2.00-$2.30.
1 month later on:
  • On May 23,2013 guidance for FY2014 was lowered to $1.70-$2.00
3months later on:
  • On September 5,2013 guidance was lowered again to $1.20-$1.50
When the year ended on January 31,2014 the FY2014 EPS came in @ $0.78 per share.

Everyone needs to realize that this company has generated a total of negative $434 million of operational cash flow over last 13 quarters combined.

The Management is deceiving the Public by advertising NON GAAP cash flow. The only reason that that insignificant number was positive in this Q1 is because they add the monies they borrowed in the first quarter to cash flow. (that is why they allowed the floor plan debt to go up, so that they can make their NON GAAP cash flow number to be positive, how ridiculous)

 By increasing their net floor plan debt they were able to report a positive NON GAAP C/F number in Q1. Ridiculous? definitely.

Management has an equity interest in Dealer Sites LLC. Titan recently increased their lease agreements with Dealer Sites from $50million to $100 million last year.
Management is making money on properties, (thanks to Titan footing the bills).
Titan pays for insurance and all expenses of the property although it is owned by outside entity owned by management.
In FY 2012 and FY2013 the 10K disclosed the related party dealings in detail. In April's FY2014 10k , Deloitte allowed Titan to omit this disclosure.

It appears to me that CNH was stuffing Titan with inventory these past few years to boost CNH's own revenue/profit numbers (timely with Fiat deal). The relationship with CNH is very Cozy. A large percentage of the inventory that Titan has parked, they are not paying interest on.

Wells Fargo recently amended the convertible note terms for the 3rd time. (tightening the covenants more and more).
Titan's debt/equity for Q1 increased from .70 to .716
 

The other big issue here, is what are these Mutual Fund Analysts (Money Managers) getting paid for? Have you seen what ZACKS has been reporting? another joke.

If you look on Morningstar at the list of institutional holders of both the Equity and the Debt, I wonder how do these decision makers have jobs? It is even more scary that mom and pop are trusting their nest egg monies with these amateurs (and they actually pay these funds to manage their money).

oh boy, Wall Street, what a silly place

List of Institutional Holders  

Archives:


Most OverPriced Stock Titan Machinery Files Proxy Statement

A Review of Securities & Exchange Commissions Comments regarding Titan Machinery Disclosure

Markowski says Titan Machinery Will Be Bankrupt

10K FootNote: Wells Fargo Tightens Debt Agreement (again) on Titan Machinery

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

3 D Printer Stock Stratasys is Gonna Get Flattened

CLICK YouTube Video Created on January 14,2013 DDD & SSYS


To See a technical chart by Greg Harmon of DragonFly Capital,  click here:  

Click to Equities Research original post at my home page.  

After Reporting 2011 2nd quarter financials for the period ending June 30,2011, Stockdiagnostics upgraded SSYS from a 2 to 1 ranking (highest ranking) because the company reported it's 4th consecutive positive operational cash flow quarter. Shares have since climbed from $25 to over $80.

SSYS reported 2012 3rd quarter financials for the period ending September 30,2012 and the company reported Negative operational cash flow of -($9.6 million) a 262% decline vs. Q3 2011. hence the downgrade.


click image to enlarge:





  • ON December 3,2012 Stratasys announced the completed Merger of Objet Inc. 

    This acquisition brought the number of shares outstanding to 41 million.
    At $83 a share the company today has a market capitalization over $3.4 billion.

    The problem is if you go to the Company's investor relations page   .
    it states the company only has 21 million shares outstanding and  a $1.8 billion market cap. (40 days have passed since the share number has increased to 41.
    This error also appears at Yahoo Finance and Morningstar. 

    Motley Fool has published articles analyzing the stock using 21 million shares outstanding and not 41 million shares outstanding.

    ...and the Yahoo message boards have too many rumors to list about the company possibly being taken over by General Electric or Hewlett Packard.

    The Annual CES Show  last week added hype to the fire as well. 

    If these online financial websites have the wrong number of shares outstanding then it begs to ask the following questions:


    I would think that with nearly twice as many shares outstanding that the EPS (Earning Per Share of $0.86 should probably need to be reduced (adjusted lower) or the PE multiple will need to be Ratched up.

    Of course Objet numbers (earnings, if there are any) will need to be added to EPS  or subtracted).

    The short interest % ratio should probably be looked at as well. if every other data point is adjusted I guess short interest is probably going to be lower %.

    The daily volume of shares all of sudden is less in proportion to more shares outstanding as well. In other words, in November 600,000 share average volume was significant with only 21 million shares outstanding.

    Today's 399,000 share volume means even less in the big picture with nearly twice as many shares outstanding.

    volume this DRY at a top (all time high  (18 yr) was made last week @ $87) is referenced as a CROWDED TRADE.

    this could end badly.

    I think the Company SSYS is way overdue to Update their Investor Relations Website where they say there are only 21 million shares outstanding.

    I know they use Morningstar numbers but that is no excuse for posting an erroneous number.

    Its been nearly 40 days and their investor relation page still shows $1.8 billion mkt cap.


    Objet was valued at $1,015,633,034 according to merger valuation in SEC filing. Objet owns 45% of new entity and the former SSYS retained 55%. (excluding options and insider positions and miscel.).
     not that important but original SSYS would be $1.2 billion value.
    Now together 40 days later valuation is still over $3 billion

     My letter to the WSJ and BloombergAlthough WSJ & Bloomberg have the correct shares outstanding and mkt capitalization correct, neither of them Readjusted the EPS. THE EPS on these two sites needs to be adjusted down taking into account more shares. THe $0.86 EPS they state should be $0.46 and then they would also have to correct their PE multiples from 98 to 190 PE.
    hi
                 on your quote page for the ticker SSYS

    you adjusted the shares outstanding correctly to 41 million up from 21 million.

    but you did not adjust the eps down fro $0.86 to $0.47

    and you would then need to change the PE from 99 to 190

    Bloomberg page is wrong too in the same way.

    meanwhile Morningstar, Yahoo FInance and SSYS's home page still show 21 million shares outstanding and the mkt cap they show is a mere $1.8 billion which should be $3.4 billion the way WSJ has it.


    Someone need to fix all this ERRONEOUS DATA and let the world Know

    small investors think their buying at a PE of 98 when they're buying at a PE of maybe 190, maybe even higher

    WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE responds to my email : click here 

    Learn About Importance of Operational Cash Flow: